tg-me.com/PolemicKnowledge/192
Last Update:
Um Polêmico e Feliz Natal a Todos. 🎄✨
BY Polemic Knowledge
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn1.cdn-telegram.org/file/Tj40GUC5PgcTUF9-5xdCdt-HIgEcKPdpsl1pbA8j6CLpcoGNWI2mb2F-VUVdaJuO49puttuNoEhUEnFwwEsZq_e-Xbye5fQL9_kIiMAJKXFwvzL1l6khpEMnFChPIHAnzs9WU4-KEHCimOTRTDU1yys_jhX7s4v84OFj0_3hhi5FuqGJv2WIMFTcHgC-bRhcZvus4FASd1eQ95WlPyAmNdTIOQaheSc8QgWoX4uEGx5P-XetA0a1VZX7ef9dwQCiWl7Yn_GZxmFsrP9vUdRqwc88zxrMAL08akQwMtc8uiZDIW6H38CrWJPHDZEkabkOXieWfLXmRL8t5WP-RuSC2Q.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/PolemicKnowledge/192
Um Polêmico e Feliz Natal a Todos. 🎄✨
BY Polemic Knowledge
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
Polemic Knowledge from ua